Explore Collections

You are here:
CollectionsOnline
/
Alternative designs for the front entrance using different orders, July 1824
Browse
Reference number
SM (93) 49/3/34
Purpose
Alternative designs for the front entrance using different orders, July 1824
Aspect
93 Two elevations of the entrance with plan of the entrance
Scale
bar scale of 1/3 inch to 1 foot
Inscribed
Height of the Building 55'3'' and some dimensions given
Signed and dated
- Lincolns Inn Fields / 22nd July 1824
Medium and dimensions
Pen, sepia, black, grey, pink and blue washes with double ruled border on wove paper (596 x 480)
Hand
George Bailey (1792-1860, pupil then assistant 1806-37, curator 1837-60)
Watermark
Weatherley & Lane 1818
Notes
Soane's original designs for the new Board of Trade and Privy Council offices had used a Corinthian order copied from the Temple of Vesta at Tivoli. That order, however, was not to Robinson's liking - it was (he argued) 'universally deemed extremely defective from the dwarfish proportions of its capital'. He urged instead that the order should be taken from the Temple of Jupiter Stator (Castor and Pollux) at Rome, which was 'allowed to be amongst the finest specimens of the Corinthian order'. Soane made drawing 93 to compare the two orders in the context of the new building.
The order of the Temple of Jupiter Stator (Castor and Pollux) was much more elaborate than that of the Temple of Vesta - Soane described it as 'the richest order in all the remains of Antiquity' in contrast to the 'plain example of the Corinthian order' of Tivoli. The entablature on drawing 93 is therefore much taller and increases the height of the building by around 2½ feet. This would inevitably add to the cost of the building. Soane restated his argument - with new drawings - in front of the Special Committee in 1828 (q.v. drawings 274-275).
The order of the Temple of Jupiter Stator (Castor and Pollux) was much more elaborate than that of the Temple of Vesta - Soane described it as 'the richest order in all the remains of Antiquity' in contrast to the 'plain example of the Corinthian order' of Tivoli. The entablature on drawing 93 is therefore much taller and increases the height of the building by around 2½ feet. This would inevitably add to the cost of the building. Soane restated his argument - with new drawings - in front of the Special Committee in 1828 (q.v. drawings 274-275).
Level
Drawing
Digitisation of the Drawings Collection has been made possible through the generosity of the Leon Levy Foundation
If you have any further information about this object, please contact us: drawings@soane.org.uk