
Browse
Reference number
Purpose
Aspect
Scale
Inscribed
[Inscribed on monument] ESTITVER (surviving fragment of CIL, 6, 938)
Signed and dated
- c.1513/14
Datable to c.1513/14
Medium and dimensions
Hand
Notes
Although various views of the temple survive from this period, the depiction here is the only measured ‘site drawing’ charting the structure’s standing remains to survive from the sixteenth century, apart from a sheet featuring various details compiled perhaps a few years later by Antonio da Sangallo the Younger (see Günther 1988, pp. 313, note 269) and a reconstruction of the whole building produced at around this same time by his brother Giovanni Battista. In format, the drawing follows the pattern of several others in the codex in combining a frontal depiction of the structure with a raking view of its side; but, like the one next to it, it is not at all precise in its execution. The columns are poorly proportioned, the bases are simplified, although their detailed design is recorded in another Coner drawing (Fol. 79r/Ashby 133), and the entablature is indicated only schematically, although the frontal plaque with the surviving letters of the inscription is shown, as is a bucranium in the frieze at the side, this being the first of the objects forming the extant relief. In other respects, however, the remnants are remarkably well-observed. The measurements are accurate, and especially notable is the inclusion of plinths beneath the bases. These plinths are not seen, for example, in Giovanni Battista’s reconstruction, but those beneath the frontal columns seem certainly to have been based on sound observation, since archaeological investigation of the building has shown that these columns were raised on plinths which had spaces between them for additional steps (De Angeli 1992, p. 83).
What is recorded in the fragmentary plaque fronting the entablature is the surviving part of the final word – RESTITVER[VNT] – of the dedicatory inscription, which has an ‘E’ as the first letter, unlike in the drawings by Antonio and Giovanni Battista da Sangallo where this letter is omitted and the inscription starts with the following ‘S’, Antonio commenting on one of his drawings (Uffizi 1140 Ar) that ‘this small part is in existence’ (questo pocho e in opera) and evidently not noticing the preceding ‘E’. Antonio also thought, erroneously, that he knew the whole inscription, and noted on the drawing what he believed this to be, stating that it was taken from the ‘book of inscriptions’ (quello e tratto dal libro delli epitaffij). The same mistaken inscription features on Giovanni Battista’s reconstruction.
OTHER IMAGES MENTIONED: [Antonio da Sangallo the Younger] Florence, GDSU, 1140 Ar–v (Bartoli 1914–22, 6, p. 89; Frommel–Schelbert 2022, 1, p. 110); [Giovanni Battista da Sangallo] London, RIBA, Codex Rootstein-Hopkins, fols 16r and 17r (Campbell–Nesselrath 2006, pp. 75 and 77; Campbell in Frommel–Schelbert 2022, 1, pp. 253–54)
OTHER DRAWINGS IN CODEX CONER OF SAME SUBJECT: Fol. 79r/Ashby 133
Literature
De Angeli 1992, pp. 42–43
Census, ID 48280
Level
Sir John Soane's collection includes some 30,000 architectural, design and topographical drawings which is a very important resource for scholars worldwide. His was the first architect’s collection to attempt to preserve the best in design for the architectural profession in the future, and it did so by assembling as exemplars surviving drawings by great Renaissance masters and by the leading architects in Britain in the 17th and 18th centuries and his near contemporaries such as Sir William Chambers, Robert Adam and George Dance the Younger. These drawings sit side by side with 9,000 drawings in Soane’s own hand or those of the pupils in his office, covering his early work as a student, his time in Italy and the drawings produced in the course of his architectural practice from 1780 until the 1830s.
Browse (via the vertical menu to the left) and search results for Drawings include a mixture of Concise catalogue records – drawn from an outline list of the collection – and fuller records where drawings have been catalogued in more detail (an ongoing process).