Explore Collections
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d6f1/2d6f18bb26a7560cd855fcfe8d814f34e6ee7487" alt="Explore The Collections Explore The Collections"
You are here:
CollectionsOnline
/
Drawing 2 (top right): Unidentified Corinthian capital for a pilaster
Browse
Reference number
SM volume 115/140b
Purpose
Drawing 2 (top right): Unidentified Corinthian capital for a pilaster
Aspect
Perspectival view
Scale
Not known
Signed and dated
- c.1515
Datable to c.1515
Medium and dimensions
Pen and brown ink over traces of black chalk and a single vertical stylus line at centre
Hand
Bernardo della Volpaia
Notes
The Corinthian capital drawn here is distinctive in having side volutes (one shown) that rise vertically, and palmettes around the bottom that are laid on top of acanthus. That it belongs to a pilaster is clear from the top of the shaft being shown. The drawing depicts just enough of the capital to include the anthemion in the middle, with the remainder of the right-hand side partly drawn and left unfinished, its completion impossible owing to the drawing’s positioning on the page.
What is very possibly the same capital appears in a drawing, from a little earlier, by the anonymous Florentine artist of the Codex Strozzi. This again mainly shows the capital’s left-hand side, but the proportions are much shorter, the palmettes alternate with acanthus leaves rather than covering them, and the depicted volute is of a much more delicate foliate design. Later drawings in Kassel and New York, which again show the left-hand portion of the capital, tend to agree with the Codex Strozzi depiction, except that they show the volute as a combination of a scroll and leaf, and thus more like the one shown in the Coner drawing. The conclusion from all this is that the various drawings were based on sources that interpreted the capital in different ways, or else were not very precise in their detailing.
The drawing follows the convention of showing a horizontal slice through the shaft, but one that is roughly drawn and gives the impression that the shaft is broken, as is the case with other drawings on this sheet and elsewhere. The cut-through section is also hatched rather than shaded in wash, a technique typical of the later phase of the codex’s production. The drawing was copied by Michelangelo in modified form.
RELATED IMAGES: [Michelangelo] Florence, CB, 1Ar: left side (De Tolnay 1975–80, 4, p. 49; Agosti–Farinella 1987, pp. 92–93)
OTHER IMAGES MENTIONED: [Anon.[ Florence, GDSU, Codex Strozzi, 1597 Ar (Bartoli 1914–22, 6, p. 27); [Anon.] Kassel, Schloss Wilhelmshöhe, Graphische Sammlung, Codex Kassel, fol. 38v (Günther 1988, p. 359 and pl. 86b); [Anon. French Draughtsman] New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Goldschmidt Scrapbook, no. 68 (D'Orgeix 2001, p. 197)
What is very possibly the same capital appears in a drawing, from a little earlier, by the anonymous Florentine artist of the Codex Strozzi. This again mainly shows the capital’s left-hand side, but the proportions are much shorter, the palmettes alternate with acanthus leaves rather than covering them, and the depicted volute is of a much more delicate foliate design. Later drawings in Kassel and New York, which again show the left-hand portion of the capital, tend to agree with the Codex Strozzi depiction, except that they show the volute as a combination of a scroll and leaf, and thus more like the one shown in the Coner drawing. The conclusion from all this is that the various drawings were based on sources that interpreted the capital in different ways, or else were not very precise in their detailing.
The drawing follows the convention of showing a horizontal slice through the shaft, but one that is roughly drawn and gives the impression that the shaft is broken, as is the case with other drawings on this sheet and elsewhere. The cut-through section is also hatched rather than shaded in wash, a technique typical of the later phase of the codex’s production. The drawing was copied by Michelangelo in modified form.
RELATED IMAGES: [Michelangelo] Florence, CB, 1Ar: left side (De Tolnay 1975–80, 4, p. 49; Agosti–Farinella 1987, pp. 92–93)
OTHER IMAGES MENTIONED: [Anon.[ Florence, GDSU, Codex Strozzi, 1597 Ar (Bartoli 1914–22, 6, p. 27); [Anon.] Kassel, Schloss Wilhelmshöhe, Graphische Sammlung, Codex Kassel, fol. 38v (Günther 1988, p. 359 and pl. 86b); [Anon. French Draughtsman] New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Goldschmidt Scrapbook, no. 68 (D'Orgeix 2001, p. 197)
Literature
Ashby 1904, p. 69
Census, ID 46982
Census, ID 46982
Level
Drawing
Digitisation of the Codex Coner has been made possible through the generosity of the Census of Antique Works of Art and Architecture Known in the Renaissance, Berlin.
If you have any further information about this object, please contact us: drawings@soane.org.uk