Explore Collections
You are here:
CollectionsOnline
/
Folio 74 verso (Ashby 127): Unidentified elaborate column base
Browse
Reference number
SM volume 115/127
Purpose
Folio 74 verso (Ashby 127): Unidentified elaborate column base
Aspect
Perspectival elevation from above with partial section, with measurements
Scale
To an approximate scale of 1:5
Inscribed
[Drawing] Media. pars. est. M[inuti]. 26 (‘The half part [width of plinth] is 26 minutes’); [measurements]
[Mount] 127 [x2]
Signed and dated
- c.1513/14
Datable to c.1513/14
Medium and dimensions
[Drawing] Pen and brown ink and grey-brown wash over stylus lines, black chalk and compass pricks; on laid paper (232x166mm), rounded corners at left, inlaid
[Mount] Frame lines, in pen and dark brown ink, 10mm apart; window (224x158mm)
Hand
Bernardo della Volpaia
Watermark
See recto
Notes
This base, which has not been identified, is a relatively small one with a plinth that measures, according to the annotation at the bottom, almost exactly half a metre in width. With a moulding sequence of plinth, lower torus, scotia, astragal, scotia and upper torus, it is of a type also seen on the previous page and used too for the internal upper storey of the Pantheon (Desgodetz 1682, p. 52). It differs, however, in that the lower torus is adorned with cable decoration and the upper one is ornamented with banded laurel.
The drawing’s format is unique in the codex, being unlike all other representation of highly decorated bases. At first sight, the base appears to be for a three-quarter column, but this is impossible to judge from the position of the fictional dowel hole on the far right, which must be at the base’s centre. What is especially odd about the drawing is that the drawn profile is part of a raking section through the base starting at the mid-point of the plinth’s front rather than being a conventional transverse section positioned at the right. The perspectival treatment of the plinth is also incongruous, in that the receding lines are far from convergent. It seems likely that the drawing with its unnecessary distortions and illogicalities was a failed experiment in representational format, which would explain why it was not repeated. The drawing’s lonely position on the top right-hand corner of the sheet suggests that others of bases were to have been added later on.
The drawing’s format is unique in the codex, being unlike all other representation of highly decorated bases. At first sight, the base appears to be for a three-quarter column, but this is impossible to judge from the position of the fictional dowel hole on the far right, which must be at the base’s centre. What is especially odd about the drawing is that the drawn profile is part of a raking section through the base starting at the mid-point of the plinth’s front rather than being a conventional transverse section positioned at the right. The perspectival treatment of the plinth is also incongruous, in that the receding lines are far from convergent. It seems likely that the drawing with its unnecessary distortions and illogicalities was a failed experiment in representational format, which would explain why it was not repeated. The drawing’s lonely position on the top right-hand corner of the sheet suggests that others of bases were to have been added later on.
Literature
Ashby 1904, p. 64
Census, ID 45697
Census, ID 45697
Level
Drawing
Digitisation of the Codex Coner has been made possible through the generosity of the Census of Antique Works of Art and Architecture Known in the Renaissance, Berlin.
If you have any further information about this object, please contact us: drawings@soane.org.uk