Explore Collections Explore The Collections
You are here: CollectionsOnline  /  Folio 5, verso of flap (Ashby 8A): Tomb near the Ponte Nomentano

Browse

  • image SM volume 115/8a-b

Reference number

SM volume 115/8a-b

Purpose

Folio 5, verso of flap (Ashby 8A): Tomb near the Ponte Nomentano

Aspect

Plan

Scale

To an approximate scale of 1:80

Inscribed

Pianta d’vna Sepolt[ura] di la di S./ Agnes. (‘Plan of a tomb beyond the church of Sant’Agnese’)

Signed and dated

  • c.1625/35
    Date range: c.1625/35

Medium and dimensions

Pen and brown ink and pink-brown wash over black chalk and compass pricks; on half a double sheet of laid paper (232x331mm) treated as a flap

Hand

Seventeenth-Century Hand 1 (Codex Ursinianus Copyist)

Watermark

See Fol. 5r and flap

Notes

This drawing of a tomb, added to the codex in the seventeenth century, is identified in the caption as being located just beyond the church of Sant’Agnese. It was tentatively identified by Ashby (1904) on the basis of an earlier drawing of the same structure by Francesco da Sangallo in the Codex Barberini, which is labelled as standing just beyond the Ponte Nomentano over the River Aniene. Ashby later connected this identification with the then-surviving concrete core of a tomb in this vicinity (Ashby 1906, p. 46). The Coner plan (as Ashby realised) is a copy of the Barberini drawing, although with minor differences. Thus, whereas the Coner plan shows the tomb as having stepped embrasures that are all axially aligned, the Barberini drawing represents two of them (those to left and right) as skewed so that the openings in the exterior faces are off-centre with respect to the external half-columns that frame them; and whereas the Coner plan shows the external half-columns and corner pilasters as having undecorated shafts, the Barberini drawing depicts them as fluted. Both drawings, however, show the pilasters as being wider than the half-columns, and the central bays of the three on each side as being narrower than the others, and this is confirmed by a schematic plan included on a drawing by Giovanni Francesco da Sangallo. Another Coner drawing, one produced by Bernardo della Volpaia, records in detail the Doric capital of a half-column, which is indeed fluted, together with the entablature above it.

RELATED IMAGES: [Francesco da Sangallo] Rome, BAV, Barb. lat. 4424 (Codex Barberini), fol. 38v (Hülsen 1910, 1, p. 55; Borsi 1985, pp. 198–200)

OTHER IMAGES MENTIONED: [Giovanni Francesco da Sangallo] Florence, GDSU, 2054 Av (Bartoli 1914–22, 6, p. 102; Frommel–Schelbert 2022, p. 215)

OTHER DRAWINGS IN CODEX CONER OF SAME SUBJECT: Fol. 47r/Ashby 75

Literature

Ashby 1904, pp. 14–15
Campbell 2004, 2, pp. 604–05
Census, ID 45038

Level

Drawing

Digitisation of the Codex Coner has been made possible through the generosity of the Census of Antique Works of Art and Architecture Known in the Renaissance, Berlin

If you have any further information about this object, please contact us: drawings@soane.org.uk

Sir John Soane's collection includes some 30,000 architectural, design and topographical drawings which is a very important resource for scholars worldwide. His was the first architect’s collection to attempt to preserve the best in design for the architectural profession in the future, and it did so by assembling as exemplars surviving drawings by great Renaissance masters and by the leading architects in Britain in the 17th and 18th centuries and his near contemporaries such as Sir William Chambers, Robert Adam and George Dance the Younger. These drawings sit side by side with 9,000 drawings in Soane’s own hand or those of the pupils in his office, covering his early work as a student, his time in Italy and the drawings produced in the course of his architectural practice from 1780 until the 1830s.


Browse (via the vertical menu to the left) and search results for Drawings include a mixture of Concise catalogue records – drawn from an outline list of the collection – and fuller records where drawings have been catalogued in more detail (an ongoing process).