
Browse
Reference number
Purpose
Aspect
Scale
Inscribed
[Mount] 7 [x2]
Signed and dated
- c.1625/35
Date range: c.1625/35
Medium and dimensions
[Mount] Frame lines, in pen and dark brown ink, 10mm apart; window (222x152mm)
Hand
Watermark
Notes
The plan drawn here is very different in layout. At the front, the surviving four-bay portion of the elevation is mirrored, and an extra bay is added in the middle to join the two matching halves and create an overall composition of nine bays in width. This frontal composition is then mirrored by an identical but wholly fictitious arrangement at the back, with sides similarly of nine bays in extent and enough space between the two fronts for a pair of shallow U-shaped interiors containing staircases that are separated from each other by two rows of columns. The nine-by-nine-bay plan takes no account of the steeply rising terrain of the actual site. Instead, it is closely based on one of two idealised reconstructions of the plan drawn by Giuliano da Sangallo in his Barberini sketchbook. The first is a ‘half’ plan’ which would provide the basis for later renditions of the building published by Sebastiano Serlio (first issued in 1540) and Bartolomeo Marliani, while the other (fol. 29v) is the even more implausible ‘full’ or square plan that is reproduced here. The Coner copy, however, shows abundant signs of the draughtsman’s inexperience (Campbell 2004). The columns are much thinner than in the original and the use of wash makes the drawing difficult to read, the plinths being filled with wash, like the walls but unlike the column shafts, and the internal steps being alternately left blank or given a wash infill. Also different are the projections on the back walls of the shallow U-shaped interior structures, which in the Sangallo drawing are rough and uneven but in the copy are much more regular, and more like pilasters responding to the columns facing them.
Although there was no drawing in the original sixteenth-century Coner compilation of the entire Septizodium, a measured detail was included of the cornice of its podium (Fol. 68r/Ashby 116). Why the building was not documented more fully is unclear, but it may be that a more complete survey of the surviving remains was intended but had still not been accomplished when work on the sketchbook’s production was curtailed.
RELATED IMAGES: [Giuliano da Sangallo] Rome, BAV, Barb. lat. 4424 (Codex Barberini), fol. 29v (Hülsen 1910, 1, p. 45; Borsi 1985, pp. 157–63)
OTHER IMAGES MENTIONED: [Giuliano da Sangallo] Rome, BAV, Barb. lat. 4424 (Codex Barberini), fol. 30r (Hülsen 1910, 1, p. 45; Borsi 1985, pp. 157–63); Serlio 1619, fol. 87v; Marliani 1544, p. 68; [Antonio Lafreri], in Speculum romanae magnificentiae (Hülsen 1921, p. 151, no. 40a)
OTHER DRAWINGS IN CODEX CONER OF SAME SUBJECT: Fol. 68r/Ashby 116
Literature
Campbell 2004, 2, pp. 602–03
Census, ID 43906
Level
Sir John Soane's collection includes some 30,000 architectural, design and topographical drawings which is a very important resource for scholars worldwide. His was the first architect’s collection to attempt to preserve the best in design for the architectural profession in the future, and it did so by assembling as exemplars surviving drawings by great Renaissance masters and by the leading architects in Britain in the 17th and 18th centuries and his near contemporaries such as Sir William Chambers, Robert Adam and George Dance the Younger. These drawings sit side by side with 9,000 drawings in Soane’s own hand or those of the pupils in his office, covering his early work as a student, his time in Italy and the drawings produced in the course of his architectural practice from 1780 until the 1830s.
Browse (via the vertical menu to the left) and search results for Drawings include a mixture of Concise catalogue records – drawn from an outline list of the collection – and fuller records where drawings have been catalogued in more detail (an ongoing process).